<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fair market value as on 01.04.1981 cannot be reduced through valuation reference when supported by a registered valuer&#039;s report.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100333</link>
    <description>For AY 2009-10, the pre-amendment position on reference to a Valuation Officer governed the computation of capital gains. Where the assessee adopted the fair market value of the property as on 01.04.1981 on the basis of a registered valuer&#039;s report, the Assessing Officer had no authority to make a reference merely to reduce that value. On that footing, the Valuation Officer&#039;s report was held irrelevant for recomputing long-term capital gains, and the resulting addition was deleted. The alternate contention on tolerance in sale consideration was not examined because the primary issue was ative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Fair market value as on 01.04.1981 cannot be reduced through valuation reference when supported by a registered valuer&#039;s report.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100333</link>
      <description>For AY 2009-10, the pre-amendment position on reference to a Valuation Officer governed the computation of capital gains. Where the assessee adopted the fair market value of the property as on 01.04.1981 on the basis of a registered valuer&#039;s report, the Assessing Officer had no authority to make a reference merely to reduce that value. On that footing, the Valuation Officer&#039;s report was held irrelevant for recomputing long-term capital gains, and the resulting addition was deleted. The alternate contention on tolerance in sale consideration was not examined because the primary issue was ative.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:25:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>