Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Penalty under section 271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation could not survive once the underlying transfer pricing adjustment had been deleted and that deletion had been affirmed. The Tribunal held that, with the foundation of the penalty proceedings removed, there was no basis to sustain the penalty on the same transaction. The Revenue's challenge to deletion of the penalty failed, and the appellate order was upheld. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed as infructuous because the remaining grounds had become academic.
Penalty under section 271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation could not survive once the underlying transfer pricing adjustment had been deleted and that deletion had been affirmed. The Tribunal held that, with the foundation of the penalty proceedings removed, there was no basis to sustain the penalty on the same transaction. The Revenue's challenge to deletion of the penalty failed, and the appellate order was upheld. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed as infructuous because the remaining grounds had become academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.