Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could survive after the related quantum transfer pricing adjustment had been deleted.
Analysis: The penalty arose from the same transfer pricing adjustment that had been deleted in quantum proceedings and the deletion had been affirmed in further appeal. Once the basis of the penalty was removed, the Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings had no independent foundation to stand. In view of acceptance of the primary contention, the remaining grounds, including jurisdictional and factual objections, became academic.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 271G did not survive and the deletion of penalty was upheld, in favour of the assessee.