Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty under section 271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation could not survive once the underlying transfer pricing adjustment had been deleted and that deletion had been affirmed. The Tribunal held that, with the foundation of the penalty proceedings removed, there was no basis to sustain the penalty on the same transaction. The Revenue's challenge to deletion of the penalty failed, and the appellate order was upheld. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed as infructuous because the remaining grounds had become academic.
Penalty under section 271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation could not survive once the underlying transfer pricing adjustment had been deleted and that deletion had been affirmed. The Tribunal held that, with the foundation of the penalty proceedings removed, there was no basis to sustain the penalty on the same transaction. The Revenue's challenge to deletion of the penalty failed, and the appellate order was upheld. The assessee's cross-objection was dismissed as infructuous because the remaining grounds had become academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.