Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
ITAT held that reassessment initiated after three years from the end of AY 2017-18 could not be sustained where the alleged escaped income was only Rs. 5,00,000, because section 149(1)(b) applies only when the escaped income is, or is likely to be, Rs. 50,00,000 or more in the prescribed form. As that statutory threshold was not met, the sanction under section 151 was invalid and the notice under section 148 was bad in law, rendering the reassessment under section 147 liable to be quashed. The merits of the addition and the remaining grounds were left unadjudicated as academic.
ITAT held that reassessment initiated after three years from the end of AY 2017-18 could not be sustained where the alleged escaped income was only Rs. 5,00,000, because section 149(1)(b) applies only when the escaped income is, or is likely to be, Rs. 50,00,000 or more in the prescribed form. As that statutory threshold was not met, the sanction under section 151 was invalid and the notice under section 148 was bad in law, rendering the reassessment under section 147 liable to be quashed. The merits of the addition and the remaining grounds were left unadjudicated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
