Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment initiated after three years from the end of the relevant assessment year, on alleged escaped income of Rs. 5,00,000, could validly proceed under section 149(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the basis of approval under section 151.
Analysis: The reassessment was initiated for assessment year 2017-18 after the expiry of three years from the end of the assessment year, while the alleged escaped income was only Rs. 5,00,000. On those facts, the statutory threshold under section 149(1)(b) was not satisfied. The approval granted under section 151, having been based on an inapplicable reopening regime, was treated as invalid and unsustainable. The consequent proceedings under section 147 and the order under section 148A(d) could not survive. Other grounds were rendered academic and left unadjudicated.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were held to be bad in law and were quashed, with the assessee succeeding on the jurisdictional issue.