Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research & Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research & Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
