<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing comparability: government-linked and functionally dissimilar companies were excluded; disputed loss-making comparable was remanded.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100170</link>
    <description>In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research &amp; Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing comparability: government-linked and functionally dissimilar companies were excluded; disputed loss-making comparable was remanded.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100170</link>
      <description>In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research &amp; Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>