Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research & Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research & Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
