Limitation for consequential assessments runs from prescribed authority receipt, while verified purchases cannot be disallowed merely for unanswered s...
Higher depreciation for qualifying commercial vehicles, exempt-income disallowance, research deduction verification, and club-expense treatment clarif...
Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research & Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
In transfer pricing for the marketing support services segment, the ITAT excluded EDCIL (India) Ltd. because its revenue arose from dealings with Government entities and it was not a proper uncontrolled comparable; it also excluded Just Dial Ltd. for diversified operations, ownership of intangibles and absence of segmental data. Info Edge (India) Ltd. was rejected for its different service profile, multiple web-based businesses and materially different FAR profile, while India Exposition Mart Ltd. was excluded because its exhibition and conference business had a markedly different business model and employee-cost structure. The Tribunal also found that the inclusion of Cyber Media Research & Services Ltd. required verification of conflicting financial statements and remanded that issue to the TPO for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
