Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Deduction under section 57(iii) is available only where the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning the relevant income and where a direct and proximate nexus exists between the borrowing and the interest income. On the facts, the assessee failed to prove that link; the record showed use of borrowed funds for share investment and purchase of plots and residential property, and a bare assertion of intent to earn income was insufficient without supporting evidence. The earlier year was distinguishable because direct nexus had then been established. The disallowance of the interest expenditure was therefore upheld.
Deduction under section 57(iii) is available only where the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning the relevant income and where a direct and proximate nexus exists between the borrowing and the interest income. On the facts, the assessee failed to prove that link; the record showed use of borrowed funds for share investment and purchase of plots and residential property, and a bare assertion of intent to earn income was insufficient without supporting evidence. The earlier year was distinguishable because direct nexus had then been established. The disallowance of the interest expenditure was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
