Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Deduction under section 57(iii) is available only where the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning the relevant income and where a direct and proximate nexus exists between the borrowing and the interest income. On the facts, the assessee failed to prove that link; the record showed use of borrowed funds for share investment and purchase of plots and residential property, and a bare assertion of intent to earn income was insufficient without supporting evidence. The earlier year was distinguishable because direct nexus had then been established. The disallowance of the interest expenditure was therefore upheld.
Deduction under section 57(iii) is available only where the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning the relevant income and where a direct and proximate nexus exists between the borrowing and the interest income. On the facts, the assessee failed to prove that link; the record showed use of borrowed funds for share investment and purchase of plots and residential property, and a bare assertion of intent to earn income was insufficient without supporting evidence. The earlier year was distinguishable because direct nexus had then been established. The disallowance of the interest expenditure was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
