Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Absence of a signature on sanction under the reassessment provisions was treated as a challenge requiring reconsideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 292BC introduced a new legal dimension. Because the assessee had not been given an opportunity in the writ proceedings to address the effect of that retrospective provision, the court restored the writ petition for fresh consideration and left all contentions open. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the reassessment challenge, and the matter was remitted so both sides could address the applicability of the new provision before a final decision.
Absence of a signature on sanction under the reassessment provisions was treated as a challenge requiring reconsideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 292BC introduced a new legal dimension. Because the assessee had not been given an opportunity in the writ proceedings to address the effect of that retrospective provision, the court restored the writ petition for fresh consideration and left all contentions open. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the reassessment challenge, and the matter was remitted so both sides could address the applicability of the new provision before a final decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.