<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Retrospective Section 292BC prompted fresh consideration of unsigned sanction validity in reassessment proceedings</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100030</link>
    <description>Absence of a signature on sanction under the reassessment provisions was treated as a challenge requiring reconsideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 292BC introduced a new legal dimension. Because the assessee had not been given an opportunity in the writ proceedings to address the effect of that retrospective provision, the court restored the writ petition for fresh consideration and left all contentions open. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the reassessment challenge, and the matter was remitted so both sides could address the applicability of the new provision before a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Retrospective Section 292BC prompted fresh consideration of unsigned sanction validity in reassessment proceedings</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100030</link>
      <description>Absence of a signature on sanction under the reassessment provisions was treated as a challenge requiring reconsideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 292BC introduced a new legal dimension. Because the assessee had not been given an opportunity in the writ proceedings to address the effect of that retrospective provision, the court restored the writ petition for fresh consideration and left all contentions open. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the reassessment challenge, and the matter was remitted so both sides could address the applicability of the new provision before a final decision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:06:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>