Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Absence of a signature on sanction under the reassessment provisions was treated as a challenge requiring reconsideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 292BC introduced a new legal dimension. Because the assessee had not been given an opportunity in the writ proceedings to address the effect of that retrospective provision, the court restored the writ petition for fresh consideration and left all contentions open. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the reassessment challenge, and the matter was remitted so both sides could address the applicability of the new provision before a final decision.
Absence of a signature on sanction under the reassessment provisions was treated as a challenge requiring reconsideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 292BC introduced a new legal dimension. Because the assessee had not been given an opportunity in the writ proceedings to address the effect of that retrospective provision, the court restored the writ petition for fresh consideration and left all contentions open. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the reassessment challenge, and the matter was remitted so both sides could address the applicability of the new provision before a final decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.