Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
ICT@ Schools services were treated as one naturally bundled composite supply, with infrastructure, software, maintenance, teacher training and student instruction forming an integrated education service under the BOOT model. Applying the predominant nature test, the Tribunal held that the ICT platform was only the medium for delivering curriculum-based computer education in schools, so the services fell within the education exemption under the negative list up to 13.05.2016 and continued to be exempt under the amended Mega Exemption Notification thereafter. Because the activities were not taxable during the disputed period, the valuation and abatement objections were academic, and the Revenue's challenge was held not maintainable.
ICT@ Schools services were treated as one naturally bundled composite supply, with infrastructure, software, maintenance, teacher training and student instruction forming an integrated education service under the BOOT model. Applying the predominant nature test, the Tribunal held that the ICT platform was only the medium for delivering curriculum-based computer education in schools, so the services fell within the education exemption under the negative list up to 13.05.2016 and continued to be exempt under the amended Mega Exemption Notification thereafter. Because the activities were not taxable during the disputed period, the valuation and abatement objections were academic, and the Revenue's challenge was held not maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.