Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
ICT@ Schools services were treated as one naturally bundled composite supply, with infrastructure, software, maintenance, teacher training and student instruction forming an integrated education service under the BOOT model. Applying the predominant nature test, the Tribunal held that the ICT platform was only the medium for delivering curriculum-based computer education in schools, so the services fell within the education exemption under the negative list up to 13.05.2016 and continued to be exempt under the amended Mega Exemption Notification thereafter. Because the activities were not taxable during the disputed period, the valuation and abatement objections were academic, and the Revenue's challenge was held not maintainable.
ICT@ Schools services were treated as one naturally bundled composite supply, with infrastructure, software, maintenance, teacher training and student instruction forming an integrated education service under the BOOT model. Applying the predominant nature test, the Tribunal held that the ICT platform was only the medium for delivering curriculum-based computer education in schools, so the services fell within the education exemption under the negative list up to 13.05.2016 and continued to be exempt under the amended Mega Exemption Notification thereafter. Because the activities were not taxable during the disputed period, the valuation and abatement objections were academic, and the Revenue's challenge was held not maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
