Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

regarding capital contribution to firm

SARVESH BALDI

assessee contributed his house along with land to a firm which was now transferd (not registered) to firm by partenership deed. in furtherance of partenrship deed firm demolished the same for purpose of making commercial complex.After an year there was dispute in partners & the land (only one roof constructed) was again taken over by the assesse partner. can now the partner be taxed u/s 45(3) of the act where possession was again taken back.

kindly guide

Partner's Repossession of Land Post-Dispute: Tax Implications Under Section 45(3) of Income Tax Act Explored. (3) A partner contributed his house and land to a firm, which was then transferred to the firm via a partnership deed. The firm demolished the property to build a commercial complex. After a year, due to a dispute, the partner repossessed the land, which had only one roof constructed. The query is whether the partner can be taxed under section 45(3) of the Income Tax Act upon repossession. The response suggests that while the transaction falls under section 45(3), the specific circumstances might allow for alternative tax planning. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues