Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

TWO FY SAME EWB CLEARICAL ERROR BUT ONE IS ORDER ISSUED AND ANOTHER IS SCN RECEIVED.

MUTHUKUMARAN K

Sir,

FY 2020-21 EWB clearical error for transporter name wrongly mention in supplier place. we got order and file appeal with 10% pre deposit Rs.60000/-. Appeal is under process. Now again FY 2021-22 same above problem we got SCN from Commercial Tax Office.If they raise order again we pay pre-deposit or previous order combined the same issue.

please advice

with regards

K.Muthu Kumaran

Prior pre-deposit for an appeal is order-specific; it cannot be used to satisfy a fresh show-cause pre-deposit Clerical error in e-way bill recording transporter name under supplier occurred in two financial years. For the first year an adjudication order was issued and an appeal filed with a 10% pre-deposit of Rs.60,000; appeal is pending. For the second year a show-cause notice has been issued. Query whether the earlier pre-deposit can be applied to the new matter. Response: pre-deposit obligations are adjudication-order specific, so a separate pre-deposit is required for the second order. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues