Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 5352
Like 0 Bookmark

Applicability of Sec 269SS of I.T Act.

Date 25 Feb 2013
Replies 1 Reply
Views 2354 Views
Prohibition on cash receipts: a refundable cash lease advance may breach the cash receipt rule if characterized as refundable.
The prohibition on cash receipts may apply where a lessee pays a cash lease advance that is refundable after the lease, because applicability depends on the legal character of the amount. If the sum is refundable, the rule forbidding prescribed cash receipts is engaged. Determination of whether the payment is a refundable advance or rent is a question of fact requiring examination of the lease agreement and surrounding circumstances; factual findings and evidence will control whether the assessing officer's contention stands. (AI Summary)

Sir,

one my client has entered into the lease agreement for his property where in the lessee has paid Rs.500000/ in cash to the Landlord (assessee) and taken the possession of the  property, with the condition that the NO rent will be paid and Rs. lease amount of Rs.500000/- will be refunded after 3 years, without any interest on the same.

Now the assessing officer says 1) Assessee should have received the lease advance by Chq only and not by cash, hence, the provisions of 269 will apply . 2) And Assessee has to officer the fair rent from such such property 

Pl clarify if he is correct, when there is an agreement.

Pl clarify with the case laws in favour of assesee.

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Recent Issues