Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

search case law tmi site

satbir singhwahi

Sir

two case laws quoted in baba rayaon fabrics pvt ltd vs. income tax officer ward (itat ahmedabad) 1(1), surat.  i.e.

a) Lachiminarayan madan Lal 

b) Swadesi cotton mills ltd

Both cases are of Supreme court.  Kindly help to trace text of  these two cases.

Supreme Court: Agreement or Payment Alone Doesn't Prove Services Rendered in Baba Rayaon Fabrics Tax Case. A user inquired about tracing the text of two Supreme Court cases cited in a tax dispute involving Baba Rayaon Fabrics Pvt Ltd and the Income Tax Officer. The cases are Lachminarayan Madan Lal vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal (1972) and Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited vs. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U.P. (1966). A Chartered Accountant responded with the citations and noted that the Supreme Court ruled that the mere existence of an agreement or commission payment does not confirm that services were rendered or that the payment was solely for business purposes. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues