Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Reopening u/s 147 after 153A due to DVO report

RAJESH SANGHVI

The assessment of the builder assessee were completed u/s 153A. During asst proceedigns AO rejected books and made a reference to the DVO u/s 142A to determine cost of constructon. Wihtout DVO's report the asst made u/s 153A. The assessee won till  ITAT. Now DVO report has come in which cost of cosntruction is take 25 lacs more than what the assessee has shown. Can AO reopen based on this. Before the ITAT itwas contested that DVO reference cannot be used to determine cost of construction because 69C is not covered u/s 142A. The ITAT appreciated this point.

Builder's Assessment: ITAT Supports Assessee, AO Can't Reopen Based on DVO Report for Construction Costs The assessment of a builder was completed under section 153A, with the Assessing Officer (AO) rejecting the books and referring to the District Valuation Officer (DVO) under section 142A to determine construction costs. The assessment proceeded without the DVO report, and the assessee won at the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which agreed that DVO references cannot determine construction costs under section 69C. A DVO report later indicated construction costs were 25 lakh more than reported. The query is whether the AO can reopen the assessment based on this report. The forum discusses the ITAT's appreciation of the assessee's argument. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues