Following is the List of Documents on which Cenvat Credit can be taken:
As specified in Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the CENVAT credit shall be taken by the manufacturer or the provider of output service or input service distributor, as the case may be, on the basis of any of the following documents, namely :-
(a) Invoice issued by a Manufacturer or an importer or a first stage dealer or a second stage dealer; or
(b) Supplementary invoice, issued by a manufacturer or importer or a supplementary invoice,bill or challan issued by a provider of output except where the additional amount of duty/ tax became recoverable from the provider of service on account of non-levy or non-payment or short-levy or short-payment by reason of fraud or collusion or willful mus-statement or suppression of facts, etc.
(c) Bill of entry; or
(d) Certificate issued by an appraiser of customs in respect of goods imported through a Foreign Post Office; or
(e) Challan evidencing payment of service tax, by the service recipient as the person liable to pay service tax; or
(f) Invoice, a bill or challan issued by a provider of input service on or after the 10th day of, September, 2004; or
(g) Invoice, bill or challan issued by an input service distributor under rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994.
However in reality some of these documents are difficult to get as is the case with Post Office. The Bombay Tribunal has decided in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur Versus Shah Precicast (P) Ltd. (2011 (4) TMI 292 - CESTAT, MUMBAI)= [AIT-2012-292-CESTAT] that CENVAT can be taken on the basis of photocopy of Bill of Entry.You can take credit and to play it safe please apply to the Appraiser of Customs for a Certificate for the duty paid. You may enclose a copy of the duty paying document which the Post office has given you. There are two other cases also on which the respondents in the above case relied upon. The cases are as listed below:
In the above case The Hon’ble CESTAT observed that the respondents have made efforts to obtain certified copy of the bill of entry . Further it is not disputed that the goods have suffered duty and they have been used in the manufacture of final product. Hence, the CESTAT concluded that substantial benefit cannot be denied on the basis of mere technical violation and rejected the appeal of the Revenue and decided the case in favor of the respondent.