Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Rate of Service Tax

SPIC Ltd.

Dear Sir,

We wish to bring to your kind notice that the rate of service tax was increased from 10% to 12% in the Finance Act, 2012. The Government of India vide Notification No.8/2009-ST dated 24th February 2009 fixed the rate of service tax at 10% and the same was rescinded vide Notification No.2/2012-ST dated 17th March 2012. The rescinding notification came into force on the 1st day of April 2012.

As per the existing practice, the rate of tax on various services was fixed by Government of India only by notifications and it does not find place either in the charging section or other provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. However, for the first time in the service tax regime, a new section namely 66B being the charging section was introduced in the Finance Act, 2012, which has the specific provision for the rate of tax at 12% on the value of all services, other than those services specified in the negative list. The amendment has been introduced vide Section 143F of the Finance Act, 2012.

As per Notification No.19/2012-ST dated 5th June 2012, Government of India has appointed the 1st day of July 2012 as the date on which the provisions of Section 143F shall come into force. This was also confirmed by another Order No.1/2012 dated 15th June 2012.

If we relate the Notification No.19/2012 dated 5th June 2012 as confirmed vide Order No.1/2012 dated 15th June 2012 with the rescinding Notification No.2/2012 dated 17th March 2012, there is no rate of tax for the interregnum period between 01.04.2012 to 30.06.2012, which according to us needs to be examined.

Since there cannot be a levy of tax without a rate, there seems to be a vacuum during the aforesaid period and the levy of service tax already made during the relevant period is likely to become constitutionally invalid.

We request you to kindly go through this query and shall be much thankful to have your feedback.

Thanks & Regards

Chief Manager (Taxation)

SPIC Ltd., Chennai.

Service tax rate continuity affirmed after notifications resolving alleged interregnum, sustaining enforceability of the charging provision. A contested interregnum is alleged because a rescinding notification removed the earlier notified service tax rate before the newly enacted charging provision prescribing the tax rate came into force. The Finance Act added a new charging provision and a proviso allowing the earlier charging provision to cease from a notified date; subsequent administrative notifications appointed differing commencement and cessation dates. The countervailing position is that a harmonious reading of the proviso and the notifications shows the earlier charging provision remained effective until the appointed day, so no vacuum in the rate occurred. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
sv bhasker on Jun 30, 2012

Sir,

Please refer to Section 66 of the Finance Act,1994 which specifies rate of service tax as 12%. It may please be noted that the said Section 66 will be in force till midnight of 30.6.2012. Therefore, there is no scope for any vacuum  with regard to service tax rate between 1.4.2012 to 30.6.2012, as opined by you.

SPIC Ltd. on Jul 2, 2012

Dear Sir

We thank you for your feedback. With reference to your mail, we wish to inform you that a proviso to Section 66 of the Finance Act,1994 was introduced vide Section 143D of the Finance Act 2012 wherein it has been stipulated that the provisions of Section 66 shall not apply w.e.f such date as the Central Government may by notification appoint. The Govt. of India vide Notification No.18/2012-ST dated 01.06.2012 has appointed the 1st day of June 2012 as the effective date for S.143Dand correspondingly the appointed day for the new Section 66B (charging section) which was introduced in the Finance Act 2012 vide S.143F was notified as 1st day of July 2012. Further, the Govt. of India vide Notification No.22/2012-ST dated 5th June 2012, has appointed the 1st day of July 2012 as the date from which the provisions of Section 66 will not apply, without modifying or amending Notification No.18/2012-ST dated 01.06.2012, which says that the appointed date of S.143D, under which the proviso to Section 66 was introduced, as 1st June 2012. This aspect may please be examined at your end and clarified. According to us, the Central Govt. ought to have clearly amended or rescinded Notification No.18/2012-ST dated 1st June 2012 to the extent of the appointed day for Section 143D.

Thanks & Regards

K. Govindan

Chief Manager (Taxation)

SPIC Ltd

sv bhasker on Jul 2, 2012

Dear Govindan Sir,

I would like to rely on the information provided by you to clarify the point that Section 66 of FA,1994 that prsecibed rate of service as 12% was in force till 30.6.2012. Contents of the Notfn No. 18/2012-ST and 22/2012-ST self explanatory. Proviso to Section 66 that has a power to specify the date from when the said Section would cease to be in operation,was made effective w.e f 1.6.2012 vide Notfn No. 18/2012-ST. Further, Notfn No, 22/2012-ST issued in exercise of powers conferred under Proviso to Section 66, prescribed the date 1.7.2012  from when the said Section shall not be in operation.  

Therefore, harmonious reading of the  above two Notfns make it clear that Section 66 of the Finance Act that prescribed service tax rate as 12% was in force till 30.6.2012. Accordingly, there is no room for any ambiguity on tax rate please.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues