Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

CENVAT CREDIT TAKEN ON SERVICE PROVIDE OUT SIDE

SNEHAL SHAH

Sir,

We have excise registration and Service tax registration & our product is enginering related product . So we are Manufacturing product and errected at Customer site through contract services .

Now problem is that contractor raised bill with service tax & we have awailed cenvat credit on this but in audit objection is that this errection activity is not your inside production premises so all service tax disallow and raised point & revesed with interest .

We had already pay service tax on errection servie provide to customer on Amount received from custiomer as a errection and commissioning charges , so please gude on which poing auditoer dissallow this .

Advance thanks .

Regards,

SNEHAL SHAH

 

Company's Cenvat Credit on Service Tax for Off-Premises Erection Disallowed; Differing Opinions on Eligibility and Refund A company involved in manufacturing engineering products faced an audit objection regarding Cenvat credit claimed on service tax for erection activities conducted outside its premises. The audit argued that since the erection was not part of the manufacturing process, the service tax credit was disallowed. Respondents in the forum provided differing views: one suggested that if input services are used for output services, credit should not be denied unless abatement is claimed. Another agreed with the audit, stating that the service was unrelated to manufacturing. The final response clarified that the contractor should pay the service tax, and the company should reverse the credit and seek a refund. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Surender Gupta on Apr 30, 2012

Once it is found that Input services are used to provide output services, Cenvat Credit can not be denied if you have not paid the serivce tax on such output services under the claim of abatement notification.

It is not possible to guess that on what auditor has proposed to disallow this. Full details and information is required.

r.rajkumar kumar on May 2, 2012

The audit objection is correcst ,As manufaturing company the cenvat credist can be taken for the  purchase

or service related to manufacturing items. but this insulation of machinery difference contact between you and your

service provider it is notining related to manufacturing. hence it cannot be adjected as input .

Vijay kumar on May 2, 2012

It seems that you have sub-contracted the entire erection service to a contractor and he has rendered the service and paid the service tax. In such a case, it is the contractor who has rightly paid the service tax as the service provider and the service receiver i.e. your customer can avail the credit. There was no need for you to pay the service tax since you have not rendered any service in terms of Section 65 of the Finance Act. Only in case of partial sub-contracting you could have availed the input service credit of the tax paid by the sub-contractor since that would be input service for u for your output service.  In any case, the issue is revenue neutral but Department may not accept. The audit objection is legally sustainable in the light of Board Circular which specified that  credit is available for sub-contracted works which implies that contrary is not permissible. Hence, you may reverse the credit with interest and apply for refund of the tax paid by you, subject of course to Section 11B.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues