Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Import payment pending

yujin kim

Dear sir

 

Our company has purchased motorized gate in 2007 from outside of India A company.

That time we didn't put this data in Tally by mistake.

Therefore, this data is not shown in our balance sheet.

But right now, we have to pay this amount to A company.

For this not shown amount, how can we pay to A company without problem?

 

 

Company Debates Payment for Unrecorded 2007 Motorized Gate; Options Include Capitalization or Refusal Due to Delay A company is seeking advice on how to pay for a motorized gate purchased in 2007 from an international supplier, which was mistakenly not recorded in their accounting software, Tally, and thus not reflected in their balance sheet. One respondent suggests capitalizing the expense now and explaining the delay as due to a past shortage of funds, emphasizing that no interest is involved. Another respondent questions the necessity of making the payment after such a long time, implying that the company could refuse to pay the outstanding amount. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues