Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

2009 TML 76149

PRAVEEN JOSHI

ALL DETAIL DGFT, DELHI, AND CENTRAL EXCISE 2009 TML 76149

Manufacture classification: processing and repair of marble blocks (sizing and filling) does not constitute manufacture, so duty and penalty unsustainable. The tribunal held that sizing of marble blocks and slabs and remedial operations such as pasting fiberglass sheets and applying resin to fill cracks do not amount to manufacture for excise purposes after the tariff reclassification, unless a Section Note, Chapter Note, heading or sub heading explicitly declares those processes as manufacture; therefore the demand for excise duty and penalty was not sustainable. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Surender Gupta on Sep 7, 2011

Sizing of marble blocks/slabs- The appellants were purchasing marble blocks and marble slabs for processing thereon. The blocks were subjected to processing of sizing to make it rectangular and cut into slabs of uniform thickness by using Gangsaw machines. The slabs got cracks and pin holes in some cases and pasted fibre glass sheets on one side and resin is applied to fill-in holes the cracks on the other side of the slabs for smooth transportation. Show cause notice issued and make a demand of penalty. Held that- the commissioner observed that the case of Associated Stone Industries (Kotah) Ltd. and Aman Marbles Ltd. are not applicable in the present case as the said cases pertain to the period prior to 1-3-2005 (i.e. date of introduction of 8 digit Tariff). We are unable to accept the finding of the Commissioner. We find that ratio of the above decisions are squarely applicable in this case. The activities carried out by the appellants on the marble blocks and slabs do not amount to manufacture even after introduction of 8 digit classification code in the Tariff on 1-3-2005, unless by Section Note or Chapter Note of the Tariff or by wording of the relevant heading or sub-heading, the said process has been specified as “manufacture”. Hence the demand of duty and penalty are not sustainable.

For detailed case law you need to visit: 2009 -TMI - 76149 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues