<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 TML 76149</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2951</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that sizing of marble blocks and slabs and remedial operations such as pasting fiberglass sheets and applying resin to fill cracks do not amount to manufacture for excise purposes after the tariff reclassification, unless a Section Note, Chapter Note, heading or sub heading explicitly declares those processes as manufacture; therefore the demand for excise duty and penalty was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:54:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:58:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=317308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 TML 76149</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2951</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that sizing of marble blocks and slabs and remedial operations such as pasting fiberglass sheets and applying resin to fill cracks do not amount to manufacture for excise purposes after the tariff reclassification, unless a Section Note, Chapter Note, heading or sub heading explicitly declares those processes as manufacture; therefore the demand for excise duty and penalty was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:54:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=2951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>