Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Necessity of RD 23 D

Guest
Do we still need to maintain RD 23 D as the cenvat rules 2002 dont mention anything about rule 57
Discussion on Maintaining RG 23D Register: Not Mandatory but Proper Records of Excisable Goods Required Under Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. A discussion on the necessity of maintaining the RD 23 D register in the context of Central Excise and Cenvat rules 2002 received three replies. One respondent stated that while maintaining the RG 23D register is not mandatory, dealers must keep proper records of excisable goods, suggesting the use of a custom format with necessary details. Another mentioned that the RG 23D register is not required, but a consignment-wise register for excisable goods should be maintained in any format that includes essential information. The Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 are currently applicable. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues