Valuation u/r 4 of CE valuation rule

[Nitin Bhisikar]

Valuation under rule 4 of CE valuation rule- Manufacturer of medicine sold free sample to medical practitioner throught its medical representative. Here time of delivery is other than time of removal of goods. As per rule 4 adustment is required with reference to comparable goods sold nearest to time of removal. My Query is 1) Which adjustment is required in the present case if article is specified in section 4A. 2) Which adjustment is required in the present case if article is not specified in section 4A. 3) Which adjustment is necessary if it is not free sample but sale to buyer under the promotional scheme if article specified in section 4A 4) Which adjustment is necessary if it is not free sample but sale to buyer under the promotional scheme if article not specified in section 4A. Here the difference in time because material is removed from factory but never reaches to the buyer immediately because buyer is not known at the time of removal. Material may reach to buyer through medical practioner or medical representative.

[Mukesh Kumar]

I believe you are not clear about the facts. Why you are trying to distinguish the term delivery and removal artificially. When you supply the goods (medicine) to doctors, either the removal process is complete when you supply the material to the doctors or you may treat the doctors as consignment agent or depot. If you treat the doctors as consignment agent or depot or stocking than the situation may be different where as question of transaction value u/s 4 is concerned. Where you supply samples to doctors for the purpose of either marketing or testing of your goods, mere free samples can not make them as consignment agent. I believe that these grounds would help you to ascertain the correct position and decide the issue correctly.

AI Summary

Valuation timing affects treatment of free samples and consignment status under excise valuation rules for transaction value adjustments. Valuation under excise valuation rules turns on whether supply to medical practitioners is a completed removal or constitutes consignment agency; the rule requires adjustment by reference to comparable goods sold nearest the time of removal, but mere provision of free samples for marketing or testing does not, by itself, make practitioners consignment agents and thus affects whether and how transaction value adjustments apply for specified or non specified goods and for promotional sales.