On the settled legal position, a claim under Section 54F is generally available when the net consideration from the transfer of a long-term capital asset (other than a residential house) is invested in the purchase or construction of a residential house within the prescribed time limits. The exemption is linked to investment in the residential house itself. Expenditure incurred on substantial completion, improvement, renovation, modification, or interior works that form an integral part of making the residential house habitable may, depending on the facts, be considered as part of the cost of construction/improvement of the residential house. However, the assessee must be able to demonstrate that the expenditure was incurred on the residential house and is directly connected with its construction, completion, or permanent improvement.
In contrast, expenditure on movable items such as furniture, loose furnishings, appliances, de cor items, and other detachable assets is generally not regarded as investment in the purchase or construction of a residential house for purposes of Section 54F. Therefore, amounts spent on furniture would ordinarily not qualify for exemption under Section 54F. If the new house was received pursuant to a joint development/joint venture arrangement and the sale proceeds were subsequently used for permanent interior works, civil alterations, fixtures, electrical works, flooring, false ceiling, modular units fixed to the building, etc., a stronger case may exist for treating such expenditure as investment in the residential house, subject to evidence and timing requirements. The eligibility will ultimately depend on the nature of the work, supporting documents, and whether the expenditure can be characterized as part of the residential house rather than acquisition of separate movable assets.