Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Multi-state sales allocation under Rule 31D

shalini taknet

I am advising a trader selling tobacco products across states. Under Rule 31D, GST valuation shifts to RSP-based (e.g., MRP Rs. 1000, 28% slab ? taxable value ~Rs. 218 after extraction). But for actual sales- Rs. 300 IGST to Maharashtra Rs. 400 CGST+SGST in Haryana, how do we allocate and report this output tax in GSTR-1/3B? Full RSP or apportioned by invoice value? Practical workarounds for e-invoicing mismatches?

RSP treated as cum tax value: reverse calculate taxable value and report it in returns, reconcile via invoice discounts. RSP is a cum tax value and must be reverse calculated to obtain the taxable value; that computed taxable value and the corresponding tax must be reported in GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B rather than the gross invoice sale amount. To avoid mismatches with e invoicing, record an appropriate discount or adjustment on the invoice so the amount received aligns with the reverse calculated taxable value reported in returns. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
NYAYASETU LEGAL ASSOCIATES LLP on Feb 24, 2026

You have to do reverse calculation of taxable value on the basis of RSP divided by 1.28 and same taxable value you to report in GSTR-1 & 3B (You should not report actual sale value therein).  Further as far as E-invoicing scheme is concerned you also need to mention above taxable value and tax so that both will be equal to invoice value and to match with your taxable value you need to insert discount therein.

Raam Srinivasan Swaminathan Kalpathi on Feb 25, 2026

Dear Querist

RSP is cum tax value. Please work backwards and arrive at the taxable value. This specific issue is addressed in Rule 35 of the CGST Rules, 2017

Thanks

Hitesh Jain on Feb 28, 2026

Under Rule 31D, the RSP/MRP is treated as a cum-tax value and not the taxable value itself. So for GST reporting in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, you should reverse-calculate the taxable value from the RSP (e.g., divide by 1.28 for 28% slab) and then report that computed value along with the corresponding tax. This approach aligns with how valuation under Rule 31D works and is consistent with what experienced practitioners have pointed out here.

Since your actual invoice values (IGST vs CGST + SGST splits) will differ from the reverse-calculated taxable value, you can show a discount or adjustment in the e-invoice so that the total consideration on the invoice matches the price received, while your returns reflect the correct taxable value. That helps avoid mismatches between e-invoicing and return filings.

If you need precise numbers for your specific case, it's best to apply the reverse calculation on each sale and ensure consistency between invoice and return reporting.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues