As per IBC Section 12, CIRP is 180 days + 90 days extension (270 days). Why do books mention 330 days? Is extra 60 days due to litigation, amendment, and is it mandatory for exams?
IBC 2016 TIME LIMIT 180+90=270 DAYS (330)
Section 12 establishes a 180-day CIRP period with a one-time 90-day extension (270 days). A 2019 proviso aggregates the base period, extension and time in legal proceedings into an overall 330-day cap by including litigation delays in the count. Judicial consideration removed absolute mandatory wording, leaving the 330-day figure as a directory outer boundary while preserving 270 days as the core statutory timeline. (AI Summary)
TaxTMI
There has been judicial discussion on the mandatory nature of the 330-day cap:
The Supreme Court in Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. vs. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2019 (11) TMI 731 - Supreme Court) struck down the word “mandatorily” in Section 12(3) as arbitrary under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Post that decision, the 330-day cap is generally treated as a directory upper limit, not an absolute hard stop that automatically triggers liquidation. Courts have held that under exceptional circumstances (e.g., delay attributable to court processes), the AA or appellate authority may go beyond 330 days.
In practical terms:
270 days remains the core statutory timeline for CIRP, and
330 days is the practical outer boundary including litigation delays, which most books emphasize.