Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Bill of Entry not refected in GSTR-2B

Shri Sasikumar

Dear Experts,

We have filed the refund application for supply to sez without payment of gst. Some of the Bill of Entries related to import and SEZ purchases were not reflected in GSTR-2B, however it was reflecting in GSTR-2A of the respective month. Officer disallows the ITC and revise the eligible refund. Is the officer's action correct?

ITC Denial for SEZ Supplies Due to GSTR-2B Glitch Can Be Challenged Under Section 16 and Rule 36(4) A discussion on a forum addresses the issue of Bill of Entries not appearing in GSTR-2B for SEZ supplies, despite being visible in GSTR-2A. An officer disallowed the Input Tax Credit (ITC) and revised the refund eligibility. Experts clarify that ITC for imports and SEZ supplies is based on Bill of Entry (BOE) and not invoices or debit notes, as per Section 16 and Rule 36(4). Circular 123 of 2019 supports this. It is suggested that the denial of ITC can be challenged, citing technical glitches or errors in GSTR-2B, and that grievances can be raised if necessary. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Raam Srinivasan Swaminathan Kalpathi on Jun 15, 2024

ITC is availed on imports and SEZ supplies based on BOE and NOT on invoices and debit notes as ITC is availed on reverse charge.  The mandate for availing ITC as provided in Sec.16r.w.r 36(4) (reproduced below) is applicable only to invoices and debit notes.  This is applicable even after the amendment of 2B effective from 01-Jan-22.  Further department has already clarified this issue vide Circular 123 of 2019.  This Circular still holds good and has not been rescinded.  There has been a number of clarifications on this very same issue by the experts at TMI.

Rule 36(4) reproduced

10[(4) No input tax credit shall be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which are required to be furnished under sub-section (1) of section 37 unless,-

(a) the details of such invoices or debit notes have been furnished by the supplier in the statement of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 or using the invoice furnishing facility; and

(b) the details of 12[input tax credit in respect ofsuch invoices or debit notes have been communicated to the registered person in FORM GSTR-2Bunder sub-rule (7) of rule 60.]

Ganeshan Kalyani on Jun 19, 2024

In GSTR-1, this instruction is given:

9. Any supply made by SEZ to DTA, without the cover of a bill of entry is required to be reported by SEZ unit in GSTR-1. The supplies made by SEZ on cover of a bill of entry shall be reported by DTA unit in its GSTR-2 as imports in GSTR-2. The liability for payment of IGST in respect of supply of services would, be created from this Table..

The above instruction clarifies that the recipient in DTA to claim ITC via GSTR-2 /now GSTR-3B.

 

Shilpi Jain on Jun 19, 2024

Import either from outside India or from SEZ are not transactions liable under RCM, techincally speaking as they do not appear in the RCM notifications under GST.

However, BoEs are neither invoices or debit notes. On this ground the denial can be challenged.

Also the fact that BoEs are appearing in 2A and not 2B could indicate a techincal glitch.

The circular on refund states that 2A is required to be checked to process refund and not 2B.

In my view it is a defendable case provided the BoEs are clear.

Shilpi Jain on Jun 19, 2024

Also chk if you can raise a grievance on CPGRAMS since the BoEs are not populated in 2B.

Raam Srinivasan Swaminathan Kalpathi on Jun 19, 2024

In reply to the point made by Madam Shilpi, I wish to clarify the following:

1)  The point on RCM not reflecting in either Not.10/2017-IT (Rate) or in Not. 13/2017-CT (Rate) is a hyper-technical point.  The fact is IGST on imports is paid by the recipient and that is reason why the phrase 'reverse charge' was used.

2)  As regards Circular 123 - kindly note that one cannot apply for refund of IGST without availing the ITC under Table 4A(1) as 'Import of Goods' for supplies from outside India/ SEZ.  The point was made just to elucidate to the querist that since the IGST paid on imports from SEZ can be claimed as refund without the same reflecting in 2A/ 2B the ITC can similarly be availed whether the same is reflected or not reflected in 2A/ 2B.  Also, supplies from SEZ have got populated in 2A/ 2B only since the last year or so.   

Ganeshan Kalyani on Jun 19, 2024

Sir, moreover the instruction given in GSTR-1 clearly indicates that the detail of Import from SEZ will not appear in GSTR-2B or GSTR-2A and that the recipient has to claim it through his GSTR-3B. Since, the instruction is given by Govt. the denial of ITC will not be a question. The taxpayer at any time can show the instruction to GSTR-1 and get through the notice, if received any.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues