Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

GST - Application to AAR by recipient of supply

Lalitha Krishnamurthy

Can the recipient of supply make an application to the Authority for Advance Ruling in respect of taxability of the supply received by him? The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court, in the case of Anmol Industries Limited and Anr vs The West Bengal AAR 2023 (5) TMI 288 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT, had held so. Is this the final position as of now or are there any contradictory judgements? Would be grateful to receive views of the distinguished experts.

Recipient allowed to seek Authority for Advance Ruling on taxability of supplies, but legal position may remain unsettled A High Court held that a recipient of supply may file an application with the Authority for Advance Ruling on the taxability of supplies received. The forum poster asks whether that decision is conclusive or whether conflicting rulings exist. The legal position remains potentially unsettled: a single High Court decision binds only that jurisdiction and may be varied on appeal or by the Supreme Court; other High Courts or authorities might take different views. Practitioners should check for subsequent appellate rulings, Supreme Court decisions, or differing High Court authorities before relying on the principle. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues