Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

APPEAL BEFORE CIT . CASE TANSFERRED TO NFAC.

Karuppannagounder Marimuthu

Communications were not sent to the email ID mentioned in Form 35. Different EmailId found in the notices. Appeal dismissed—info communicated in SMS. Opportunity to the appellant denied. How to redress the above defects. Only appeal to ITAT or any other remedy?

Income Tax Appeal Dismissed Due to Miscommunication; Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Specified in Form 35 An appeal related to income tax was transferred to the National Faceless Assessment Centre. The issue arose because communications were not sent to the email address specified in Form 35, with notices being sent to a different email instead. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was informed via SMS, denying them an opportunity to present their case. The query sought advice on addressing these defects, questioning whether the only recourse was to appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The response suggested filing an appeal with the Tribunal. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues