Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Eligibility of ITC

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ Ltd. received services in the year 2021 but Tax Invoice against the same received from the supplier in the year 2023 and tax invoice date also of 2023. The supplier had filed the returns and the same invoices are appearing in Return 2B also in the respective month of 2023. Can XYZ avail credit in 2023 for the services received in 2021?

Tax Credit Dispute: Can XYZ Ltd. Claim Credit for 2021 Services with a 2023 Invoice? Section 16(4) vs. Rule 47. XYZ Ltd. received services in 2021 but obtained the tax invoice in 2023, with the invoice dated 2023. The supplier filed returns, and the invoices appeared in Return 2B for 2023. A participant in the discussion pointed out that credit can be availed based on the invoice date per Section 16(4). However, another participant highlighted a potential issue with Rule 47, which mandates issuing invoices within a specific period after service provision. This discrepancy could lead to litigation, as the department might contest the compliance with Section 16(2)(a), despite the recipient's limited jurisdiction over the supplier's compliance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Mar 27, 2023

What is the date of filing annual return for 21-22 ?

Shilpi Jain on Mar 29, 2023

The time limit in section 16(4) is with reference to the invoice date only. So irrespective of when the services were received, since the invoice is dated 2023, credit can be availed.

Padmanathan KV on Mar 29, 2023

Though I agree with Shilpi Ma'am on first blush, I see a possible problem here.

Section 31 reads as under:

(2) A registered person supplying taxable services shall, before or after the provision of service but within a prescribed period, issue a tax invoice, showing the description, value, tax charged thereon and such other particulars as may be prescribed:

Rule 47 reads as under:

The invoice referred to in rule 46, in the case of the taxable supply of services, shall be issued within a period of thirty days from the date of the supply of service:

Provided that where the supplier of services is an insurer or a banking company or a financial institution, including a non-banking financial company, the period within which the invoice or any document in lieu thereof is to be issued shall be forty five days from the date of the supply of service:

Provided further that an insurer or a banking company or a financial institution, including a non-banking financial company, or a telecom operator, or any other class of supplier of services as may be notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council, making taxable supplies of services between distinct persons as specified in section 25, may issue the invoice before or at the time such supplier records the same in his books of account or before the expiry of the quarter during which the supply was made.

Admittedly, the supplier has violated Rule 47 here. A question which arises here is whether Rule 47 is mandatory or directory provision? whether an invoice issued in violation of Rule 47 shall be treated as as invoice at all? In this context, the department can take a stand that Section 16(2)(a) is not satisfied here (Assuming all other conditions of section 16 is satisfied).

In such scenarios, the defense should be that It is not in the jurisdiction of the PO of recipient to adjudicate the compliance of Rule 47 by the supplier. However, one cannot rule out the possibility of litigation IMO.

Kaustubh Karandikar on Mar 29, 2023

thanks shilpi ji, padmanathan ji and kasturi ji for your views.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues