Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 117196
- 0 -

GST - Export of Goods

Date 01 May 2021
Replies2 Answers
Views 1042 Views

Rule 96A of GST Rules provides that an exporter has to pay the applicable taxes with interest, provided the goods are not exported for more than three months.

Due to logistic issues, goods might not have left the shores and goods are brought back to vendor’s place. Brought back goods may be supplied subsequently locally or may even be exported later. In such a situation what is the idea behind making the exporter to pay IGST for the first transaction which has not materialised.

For export of services, there is a condition that the exporter has to pay the tax with interest, if sale proceeds are not realised within the time allowed. It is not clear why no such condition is prescribed for export of goods.

Rule 96A of GST Rules provides that an exporter has to pay the applicable taxes with interest, provided the goods are not exported for more than three months.

Due to logistic issues, goods might not have left the shores and goods are brought back to vendor’s place. Brought back goods may be supplied subsequently locally or may even be exported later. In such a situation what is the idea behind making the exporter to pay IGST for the first transaction which has not materialised.

For export of services, there is a condition that the exporter has to pay the tax with interest, if sale proceeds are not realised within the time allowed. It is not clear why no such condition is prescribed for export of goods.

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on May 3, 2021
1.

Shri

Certain provisions are made to safeguard the Government revenue. Moreover, Apex Court has held that "Wisdom of legislature cannot be questioned". However, you have the right to make your representation. The query raised by you deserve "not to be ignored" and requires deliberation.

Thanks

- 0
Replied on Jun 17, 2021
2.

For this issue, you need to follow Back to Town procedure.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues