Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Charging of interest

Amresh kumar

Sir,

A SCN was issued and adjudication order was passed before the interest clause was enacted in the year 1975. No demand of interest is there either in SCN or Order in original.

The company was in litigation. Now can the department insist for payment of interest. Interestingly the company was in BIFR also and in between department raised huge interest which was quashed by BIFR.

Any board circular in this regard will be very help full.

Thanks& regards

Amresh Kumar

Interest Demand Invalid for Periods Before 1975 Clause Enactment, Per Legal Provisions and Case Laws A query was raised regarding whether a department can insist on interest payment when a Show Cause Notice (SCN) and adjudication order were issued before the enactment of the interest clause in 1975. The company involved was under litigation and had its interest demand quashed by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR). Respondents agreed that interest cannot be demanded for periods before the interest clause enactment. They referenced legal provisions and case laws supporting the position that interest can only be charged if explicitly provided by statute, and recovery cannot proceed without a substantive legal basis. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues