Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be levied on arrears of tax under rule 45(4) of the Andhra Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1961 after the amendment to section 21 of the Andhra Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 21(3-D)(a) provided that section 21(5) would not apply in relation to tax levied under section 21(1) on purchases made on or after the commencement of the amending Act. The language was held to be plain and open-ended, without any temporal restriction limiting its operation to a particular crushing season. Interest on delayed payment of tax can be levied only where the charging statute contains a substantive provision authorising such levy. In the absence of such a substantive provision applicable to the relevant purchases, rule 45(4) could not independently sustain levy of interest.
Conclusion: Interest was not leviable on arrears of tax for purchases made after the commencement of the amending Act, and the challenge to the levy succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest on delayed payment of tax can be imposed only when the taxing statute itself contains a substantive authorisation for such levy, and a subordinate rule cannot create that liability in the absence of statutory support.