Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Belated payment of IGS on disputed imports -- Eligibility of ITC

Muthukumar Muthunarasimhan

Dear Experts,

Can we take ITC by way of belated payment of IGST on the disputed imports machinery which was cleared and utilized for production more than year? ( During such period case is pending and now favoured to the department.)

ITC not allowed on disputed imported machinery under Section 17(5)(i) CGST Act and Rule 36(3) CGST Rules. A forum user inquired about the eligibility of claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) through belated payment of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on disputed imported machinery used for over a year, where the case was resolved in favor of the department. An expert responded that ITC is not allowed under Section 17(5)(i) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, and Rule 36(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017. Another participant questioned whether the dispute involved customs duty, which includes IGST. The discussion clarified that the Customs authority required the IGST payment, and a participant suggested ITC might be claimed based on the duty paid challan, noting the distinction between tax and duty under the CGST Act. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Nov 19, 2019

Not allowed. See Section 17 (5) (i) of CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 36(3) of CGST Rules, 2017. Your case is hit by Section 17 (5)(i) of CGST Act, 2017.

SECTION 17. Apportionment of credit and blocked credits

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and sub-section (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely :-

(i) any tax paid in accordance with the provisions of sections 74, 129 and 130.

RULE 36. Documentary requirements and conditions for claiming input tax credit.

(3) No input tax credit shall be availed by a registered person in respect of any tax that has been paid in pursuance of any order where any demand has been confirmed on account of any fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts.

Alkesh Jani on Nov 26, 2019

Sir,

Whether, the dispute was regarding payment of Customs duty (Customs duty includes IGST)?

Muthukumar Muthunarasimhan on Nov 26, 2019

Dear Mr.Alkesh

Customs duty includes IGST payment at the time of import.

Alkesh Jani on Nov 26, 2019

Sir,

I understand Customs duty includes IGST, my question was belated payment was disputed by Customs Authority or GST Authority?

Alkesh Jani on Nov 26, 2019

Also mention who passed the order?

Muthukumar Muthunarasimhan on Nov 26, 2019

Dear Mr.Alkesh,

Customs DRI issued the summon and hearing was over. Customs authority insisted to pay IGST.

Alkesh Jani on Nov 26, 2019

Sir,

You can take credit on the basis of Duty paid challan (Customs duty). As Section 17(5) of CGST Act, 2017 is for Tax and not for Duty, neither it is disputed under Section mentioned.

This is my view. As full details were not give our expert expressed the views as per the information furnished.

Thanks

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues