Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Section 129 penalty paid for waybill pincode mistake

Piyush Pattanaik

Dear sir/madam

My vehicle was detained because of the shipping address mistake.

My driver provided bill, waybill, e invoice.

We even corrected the ewaybill afterward as there was no intent to evade taxes.

The material was loaded from the brand itself and just mistakenly I had not mentioned the shipping address.

Is there any chance that I can opeal and try to prove that it was not an attempt to evade taxes, and ask for some penalty relaxation.

Thanks  

Section 129 penalty for waybill pincode errors can be challenged by appeal under Section 107 with documentary proof. Penalty under Section 129 for goods detention may be contested where a waybill/pincode error was inadvertent and later corrected; taxpayers should supply the corrected ewaybill and corroborative documents proving the correct delivery address and absence of intent to evade tax, and pursue an appeal under Section 107 to seek penalty consideration. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Sadanand Bulbule on Sep 6, 2025

Levy of penalty under Section 129 for such human errors is absolutely unwaarnted.  It is worth to file an appeal under Section 107.

Refer; 2025 (8) TMI 1459-Allahabad High Court judgement

Ganeshan Kalyani on Sep 6, 2025

Yes you can prove with other documents justifying the correct delivery address.

Shilpi Jain on Sep 8, 2025

You can consider filing appeal with relevant docs and facts to substantiate.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues