Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Section 129 penalty paid for waybill pincode mistake

Piyush Pattanaik

Dear sir/madam

My vehicle was detained because of the shipping address mistake.

My driver provided bill, waybill, e invoice.

We even corrected the ewaybill afterward as there was no intent to evade taxes.

The material was loaded from the brand itself and just mistakenly I had not mentioned the shipping address.

 

Is there any chance that I can opeal and try to prove that it was not an attempt to evade taxes, and ask for some penalty relaxation.

 

Thanks  

Seek relaxation of Section 129 penalty for inadvertent e-way bill address error; appeal under Section 107 recommended A consignor's vehicle was detained after a shipping address error on the e-way bill; the driver produced the invoice, waybill and e-invoice and the e-way bill was later corrected, with no evidence of intent to evade tax. The consignor seeks penalty relaxation and intends to appeal. The forum respondent advises that imposing a Section 129 penalty for such inadvertent human errors is unwarranted and recommends filing an appeal under Section 107, citing recent court guidance supporting relief in similar cases. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues