Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

central excise notification no 30/2004 & rule 6 (3) amended vide not no 13/2016 _CE (NT) dated 10.03.2016

Richa Goyal

Sir,

we are a texturising unit and eligible to clear goods without payment of duty under notification No. 30/2004 provided we do not take credit of the duty paid on inputs.

Dept states that we are required to reverse 6% as per Rule 6 (3) amended vide noti no 13/2016- CE dated 01.03.2106.

Kindly guide.

Texturizing Unit Challenges 6% Reversal Demand Under Rule 6(3); Expert Highlights Procedural Compliance and Burden of Proof A texturizing unit sought guidance on whether they need to reverse 6% of the value of exempted goods under Rule 6(3) as amended by Notification No. 13/2016, despite not taking credit on inputs. The department issued a notice demanding this reversal. An expert responded, stating that such a demand is unsustainable and may be dropped if properly contested. Exported goods are considered duty-paid, negating the need for reversal. The expert emphasized the importance of procedural compliance and the burden of proof on the department to demonstrate any wrongdoing. The inquirer expressed gratitude for the guidance received. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues