Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 114729
- 0 -

REFUND OF EXCESS SERVICE TAX - PROVISION UNDER ACT

Date 06 Mar 2019
Replies6 Answers
Views 965 Views

My client had deposited service tax of ₹ 7,19,200/- wrongly in the registration number of his wife in 2015

The matter is detected in December 2019 when his wife's case was under Audit. After detection ₹ 7,19,200/- is paid again against his wife's registration and he claimed refund of the excess payment against his registration as he had no subsequent liability against duty.

Whether there is any provision in the law for getting refund of the excess tax.

Please inform how the amount to be refunded if the claim is rejected by the Joint Commissioner in the light of Sec 11B of C.E.Act

6 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Mar 6, 2019
1.

It is time barred case.

- 0
Replied on Mar 8, 2019
2.

December 2019 has not yet come. Since the wrong credit is detected lately and the said tax has been paid in the correct account, the excess paid tax can get refund citing the audit's points.

- 0
Replied on Mar 8, 2019
3.

It is December, 18 and not December, 19. Definition of 'relevant date' is to be followed. As per definition, it is time barred case.No use of filing appeal. No Court will ignore the judgement of Supreme Court, the claim being hit by time limitation.

- 0
Replied on Mar 8, 2019
4.

What is the actual date of detection ?

- 0
Replied on Mar 8, 2019
5.

To. DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN,

Sorry, the actual date of detection is 04.01.2019 when his wife's file was under Service Tax Audit.

The date of payment of Service Tax against wrong Registration Number is 19.02.2016. Amount ₹ 7,19,200/- and it is clearly mentioned in the spot memo of Audit.

As the amount was paid into the credit of Central Government as excess and unutilised Service Tax and whereas it is not any duty, should it be considered in the light of Sec. 11B of the Central Excise Act,1944.

If Joint Commissioner, Central Excise denied accepting the Refund claimed, whether any Appeal could be filed before the Commissioner of Central Excise?

- 0
Replied on Mar 8, 2019
6.

Date of detection is not relevant date. Date of payment is relevant date as per Section 11B of Central Excise Act. It was one year from the date of payment. See Explanation (f) below Section 11B(5). Appeal can be filed within 60 days from the date of receipt of order in original.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues