Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query βœ•
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

SHOULD WE FILE WRIT PETITION AGAINST GST LAPSED BY NOTIFICATION NO 20/2018

Gopikishan Kabra

PLEASE ADVICE SHOULD WE FILE WRIT PETITION AGAINST LAPSE GST NOTIFICATION ON FOLLOWING POINTS.

1. THE NOTIFICATION IS ON RECOMMENDATION OF GST COUNCIL BUT IN THE MINUTES OF GST COUNCIL THERE IS NO ANY RECOMMENDATION TO LAPSE THE ITC.

2.THE SURPLUS ITC IS OUR CURRENT ASSETS AND PART OF OUR WORKING CAPITAL .WE HAVE PAID VALUE IN CASH FOR IT AND IN CONSIDERATION OF IT RIGHT TO UTILIZE THE SAME IN FUTURE WAS GRANTED BY THE ACT AND ITC IS ACCUMULATED WITH RIGHTS TO UTILIZE IN FUTURE HENCE IT MAY NOT BE FORFEITED.

3.THERE IS HUGE DIFFERENCE IN LAPSE AND TO BLOCK FOR REFUND SO IT MAY NOT BE LAPSE UNDER INHERENTLY POWERS OF SECTION 54. IT MAY BE BLOCKED FOR REFUND ONLY. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL MISS USE OF SECTION 54. THERE IS NOANY SECTION WHICH EMPOWER TO LAPSE ANY KIND OF ITC.

WE WROTE FINANCE MINISTER REGISTERED COMPLAINT ON PG PORTAL BUT NO ANY RESPONSE .

IT WILL BE WORTH TO FILE A WRIT PETITION ? PLEASE ADVICE

Input Tax Credit lapsing may warrant a writ petition challenging notification and statutory forfeiture of accumulated credits. Challenge concerns lapsing of accumulated Input Tax Credit by notification without recorded GST Council recommendation; filer asserts ITC is a current asset and working capital paid in cash with a right to future utilization and that no statutory provision authorises forfeiture, arguing the measure misuses refund powers and may be constitutionally vulnerable; forum replies advise filing a writ and filer has filed RTI and a complaint to the finance ministry. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
SHIVKUMAR SHARMA on Oct 13, 2018

The Issue already discussed vide ssue Id: - 114143 .The Point was raised by you only. You can file Writ Petition.

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Oct 14, 2018

You can file writ petition.

Gopikishan Kabra on Oct 15, 2018

I HAVE FILED RTI APPLICATION WITH THE PRO GST COUNCIL IN THIS REGARD REPLY IS AWAITED AND LINK IS FOLLOWS

https://yourti.in/requests/dnjy84h6/rti-how-accumulated-itc-gst-lapsed-in-notification-no/
 

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues