Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Interest on Supplementary on Volume Base Transaction.

Santosh Mali

Dear All,

Interest to be paid on supplementary invoice for rate difference is known. but if supplementary invoice prepared for volume base transaction then also 'is it payable?'

e.g. If our customer gives me assurance for 50000 parts will be purchased every year and quotation of ₹ 10 given by us as per his assurance and a clause is mentioned in agreement that if he fails purchase less than 50000 qty. (say 40000) then the rate will be ₹ 12. and differential amount will be collected by issuing supplementary invoice, and further dispatch will continue by old rate i.e. ₹ 10. PLS GUIDE 'IS INTEREST TO BE PAID ON SUCH TRANSACTIONS? ' if yes then 'WHY'

Regards,

Santosh

Interest on Supplementary Invoices: Unresolved Issue After Conflicting Supreme Court Cases on Section 11AB Interpretation A forum participant inquired about the necessity of paying interest on supplementary invoices for volume-based transactions. The scenario involved a customer agreeing to purchase a certain quantity annually, with a price adjustment clause if the quantity was not met. The response highlighted a Supreme Court case, COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE vs. SKF INDIA LTD., which held that differential duty on supplementary invoices attracts interest under Section 11AB of the Act. However, this decision was later disapproved in a subsequent Supreme Court case involving STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD., leaving the issue unresolved. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues