Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Goods Rejection

george thomas

Dear Sir,

We have sold acid oil to some party and paid duty ,due to quality rejection party rejected part material for the same we have taken cenvat credit Under 16.
Again we have supplied material to party equal to rejected qty by paying duty.
20042/09.01.2015 16.51 MT ( Originally Sent)
272/09.03.2015 8.360 MT ( Party rejected the materials)
20049/12.03.2015 8.360 mt ( Resold to party)
Kindly give the procedure to be followed regarding Cenvat and Excise Duty
Guidance Sought on Cenvat Credit Reversal Under Rule 16 for Rejected Acid Oil Resupply and Excise Duty Handling A company sold acid oil, paid excise duty, and faced a quality rejection from a buyer, who returned part of the material. The company reclaimed Cenvat credit under Rule 16 and resupplied the equivalent quantity, paying duty again. The query seeks guidance on handling Cenvat and Excise Duty for this transaction. One response advised reversing the credit under Rule 16 since no manufacturing process was involved. Another response noted the lack of details about processes on the rejected goods, indicating the need for more information to provide a clear opinion. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues