Sh.Debtosh Dey Ji,
I want to explain what I understand from your query. First of all I would like to say you should resort to Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules. Since exported goods are not exempted goods, these can be treated as dutiable goods. So as per this option you are to pay 7% of the value of exempted services i.e. on trading goods. No exempted goods are involved. Hence no question of addition of 6 % of the value of exempted goods. It means only 7% of the value of traded goods is required to be paid. This has also been suggested by Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani.
Now the question of second option under Rule 6 (3A) (i) (ii) of the CCR. As already explained in my reply dated 5.11.2015, the exported goods cannot be termed as exempted goods. These are dutiable goods. So the value of exported goods have to be considered in the denominator for input-output ratio. Formula is as under
The amount of Cenvat Credit attributable to inputs used for provision of exempted services=(B/C) multiplied by D 'B' stands for total value of exempted services during the preceding year. C stands for total value of dutiable goods manufactured and removed plus the total value of output services plus value of exempted services. D stands for credit taken on the inputs during the month minus 'A'. 'A' is Rule 3 A(b)(i). Sir, Have you applied 'D' ? 'A' may be nil as it pertains to exempted goods.
I think something is missing in adopting the methodology. After completely following the methodology, if input-output ratio works out to be odd or absurd, then there may be flaw in the law. We will have to depend on certificate of C.A. or Cost Accountant required in terms of Board's circular No.868/6/2008-CE dated 9.5.2008 which is issued on the basis of actual consumption. Question nos.6 & 7 refer. Better option is 7 %.