Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

cenvat credit on plywood

SANJEEV JADHAV

Dear Sir,

Ours is foundry and we are manufacturing castings. We are purchasing plywoods for pattern mounting purpose and also availing Cenvat credit on plywood. We have availed some of cenvat credit of plywood in inputs as well as few invoices in capital goods. During Excise audit, department has taken objection that plywood is not eligible as input or capital goods and issued show cause notice. I required case law relating to this issue. Can any one help me by giving case law for above.

Foundry Challenges Central Excise over Cenvat Credit Eligibility on Plywood for Pattern Mounting; Seeks Case Law Support A foundry involved in manufacturing castings is facing an issue with the Central Excise department regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on plywood used for pattern mounting. The department objected, stating plywood does not qualify as input or capital goods, and issued a show cause notice. The foundry seeks case law to support their position. A respondent clarified that structural components essential to machinery are eligible as inputs, while those used for foundation or support of capital goods are excluded, referencing a CBE&C circular. The eligibility depends on whether the component is part of equipment or a supporting structure. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues