Debonding of EOU under a EPCG

[VIRAF DEBOO]

An EOU unit after achieving positive NFE was debonded under EPCG in 2008. As per the EXIM policy EO is 6/8 times of the duty saved. However there is a circular No 84(RE:2008)/2004-09 dated 30 April 2009, which clarifies that in case of the firm/company having DTA and as well as EOU unit which is debonded under EPCG, then the EO will be 6/8 times of the depreciated value. Kindly advise what "depreciated value" stands for and advise whether the said circular is consistent with the EXIM policy as the policy specifies calculation of EO in relation with the duty saved only.

[Lekh Sood]

Your point is right. This seems to be an error in the circular, may be inadvertent.

AI Summary

Entitlement Obligation calculation under EPCG questioned where circular ties EO to depreciated value contrary to EXIM policy.
The core operative issue is that EXIM policy sets Entitlement Obligation (EO) for EPCG as a multiple of the duty saved, but an administrative circular instead directs EO to be calculated as a multiple of the "depreciated value" for firms with both DTA and debonded EOU units; an expert reply treats the circular's deviation as likely inadvertent and inconsistent with the EXIM policy.